I've heard about "Moneyball" being in development for a long time because it was too smart. Based on a book by Michael Lewis, about the turnaround of the Oakland Athletics using overlooked statistics to make decisions about recruiting better players to win games, it was the type of text in vogue the last decade - how mathematics can solve problems. "Moneyball" was a bestseller because Lewis was able to geek-out sports. It's a combination that usually doesn't mix.
So when I heard about the struggles to get it onto the screen I assumed it was because the appreciation of data-mining and statistical analysis from the book wasn't fitting into the tired Hollywood sports mold of underdogs coming from behind. Judging from the trailer, it fit just fine. The movie shows Brad Pitt as the burnt-out coach (he overturns his desk) who hires a young kid, Jonah Hill, who convinces him to not buy players but buy runs. This scene of dialogue is the most exciting and I'm sure the book rested and expanded on this theory, but the trailer uses that sequence to basically be another excuse to assemble a bunch of misfits and show their struggles to become a real baseball team, on and off the field.
We've seen this "Bad News Bears" formula play forever, and for good reason, but I was hoping the subject of "Moneyball" would change the usual game this time. By the end, everyone's telling Pitt his strategy isn't working, he's thrown a chair, but then players start believing in themselves and rounding bases to home. Instead of a new type of sports movie about the digital age, we get the same old movie about playing by the same old rules.
Opening September 23, 2011, Verdict: Wait for the Critics



