"This is Mr. Anderson’s fifth feature and it proves a breakthrough for him as a filmmaker. Although there are more differences than similarities between it and the Sinclair book, the novel has provided him with something he has lacked in the past, a great theme. It may also help explain the new film’s narrative coherence. His first feature, “Sydney” (also known as “Hard Eight”), showed Mr. Anderson to be an intuitively gifted filmmaker, someone who was born to make images with a camera. His subsequent features — “Boogie Nights,” “Magnolia” and “Punch-Drunk Love” — have ambition and flair, though to increasingly diminished ends. Elliptical, self-conscious, at times multithreaded, they contain passages of clarity and brilliance. But in their escalating stylization you feel the burdens of virtuosity, originality, independence. “There Will Be Blood” exhibits much the same qualities as Mr. Anderson’s previous work — every shot seems exactly right — but its narrative form is more classical and less weighted down by the pressures of self-aware auteurism." - Manohla Dargis, NYTimes
I wasn't a fan of Paul Thomas Anderson until Punch Drunk Love. I never saw Hard Eight, but thought Boogie Nights and Magnolia were trying too hard to be Robert Altman. When he stopped multitasking characters running around in a mad world was when his films got interesting. Slowing down to focus on one or two people settled his hyperactivity and showed his gifts of exploring the psychic depths of living in our reality.
And he drilled really deep into the character of Daniel Plainview with There Will Be Blood. When I walked out of the theater, I felt like I had watched the start of 2001, the middle was Days of Heaven, and it ended like Citizen Kane. These aren't bad inspirations, but again, I thought it was a smart film school thesis. But I was wrong. I bought the movie out of impulse and I haven't stopped watching it since. There is dialogue and shots that are just mesmerizing in their strangeness. Its reputation will grow, it's ahead of its time, it's a masterpiece.
And as Dargis points out, the movie was a turning point for Anderson, a breakthrough to being an artist. His new movie, The Master, is coming later this year, and the teaser, edited by him, conveys the singular power of his mature sensibility. It's unlike other trailers, because it plays out long scenes, never conveys plot, no quick editing, just a spellbinding mystery.
The hype for this has been great, and rumors abound that it's about a cult leader similar to the biography of L. Ron Hubbard and scientology. Maybe it is, but this trailer doesn't reveal that. It's just a character study, a conversation about something that Joaquin Phoenix (glad he's back) should never had done. Only Anderson knows what this is about. What a tease.
Note: The presentation of this teaser's website is wonderful in its simplicity. I feel the web still doesn't know how to present video: it takes too long to download, I hate the frozen boxes with the ugly start buttons, and they often stutter. It's why this site isn't embedded with YouTube videos. Less is more.



